Is Petliura a hero for the left

Year: 2025
Class: Source
Authors: Vladyslav Starodubtsev

🟥 Red Highlights

Petliura sought to realize social justice and equality within an independent Ukrainian Republic, focusing on practical national liberation.
→ Page
He was fundamentally a "Samostiinyk"—someone for whom national independence was the prerequisite for achieving other goals.
→ Page
Petliura accepted the socialist ideal early, yet paired it with deep interest in Ukrainian culture, arts, and music (esp. Lysenko).
→ Page
From the start, he fused Marxist admiration with romantic-humanistic ideas, rejecting Marxist determinism.
→ Page
Petliura envisioned a state that ensured social harmony through regulation, redistribution, workers' rights, and class coexistence.
→ Page
He believed social development should rest on compromise, not class conflict.
→ Page
For Petliura, democracy wasn’t just about protecting individual rights—it was the only legitimate mechanism for discovering the general will (Rousseau-style).
→ Page
He sat ideologically between Ukrainian Social Federalists and Social Democrats.
→ Page
Petliura’s worldview was built on comprehensive human development, balancing individual and general interests, and protecting rights.
→ Page
Comment: Based, Petliura was a liberal.

The radical mass support of the late UNR suggests the “left of the left” (e.g. Vynnychenko, Hrushevskyi) was correct: nations are born from revolutions.
→ Page
Petliura bore some responsibility for the failure to cooperate with Ukrainian radicals during a crucial moment.
→ Page
Deep mistrust between Ukrainian political factions blocked cooperation and fueled conflict.
→ Page
Petliura and his moderate allies undermined attempts to unite with radical socialist émigrés and Western Ukrainian national-democrats.
→ Page

Taras Hunchak emphasizes Petliura tried to stop pogroms; Henry Abramson stresses UNR had progressive pro-Jewish policies, but blames Petliura’s failure to discipline troops.
→ Page

UNR attempted to coordinate with the Galician Army (UGA) to consolidate Ukrainian forces.
→ Page
Despite prior communication and alliance planning between Red UGA and UNR, the plan was sabotaged by Polish "allies."
→ Page
The UNR-Polish alliance came after the UGA had switched to the Whites, a move not supported by UNR.
→ Page
Petliura showed willingness to cooperate with independent communists (e.g. Ataman Tyutyunnik), displaying pluralism and pragmatism.
→ Page

Petliura’s generation grew up with the Communist Manifesto in one hand and Kobzar in the other—merging Ukrainian nationalism with Western European social democracy.
→ Page
His non-partisan approach was both a unifying mechanism and a source of missed opportunities.
→ Page

No serious historian views Petliura as a pogromist.
→ Page
Petliura is best seen as a talented leftist reformer, military leader, and politician. Whether to idolize him remains a personal choice.
→ Page